Your claim.
Stated plainly: buyer, job, where you believe you are, and why.
ProInstincts / Field Systems
Ninety minutes. One gate. A dated next action.
You bring the evidence. You leave with a scoring, an artifact, and a decision that could survive a cross-examination.
Built for founders standing at Signal or Proof, the first two Instinct Gates. Gates 4–5, your constraint is cadence, not counsel: the founding cohort route is the better fit.
A Gate Review is the opposite of both: an audit you write yourself, in company.
Stated plainly: buyer, job, where you believe you are, and why.
We walk what exists: Pain Ledger, receipts, pipeline, metrics with denominators. Missing evidence is a finding, not a failure.
Your gate, tested against its published pass bar. Verdict: PASS / CONTINUE / REJECT, written, with the reason that produced it.
One experiment, one artifact, one owner (you), one date, and the stop-loss for the money or hours it will take.
Links to whatever evidence exists · any numbers with their denominators · the one decision you've been avoiding. That's usually the actual agenda. Camera on. You do the writing.
Not a pitch, not a build service, not a guarantee. The session produces defensible decisions; revenue remains your department.
See current pricing on the pricing page.
Booked calendar slot, 90 minutes · full refund if you don't leave with a completed scorecard and a dated next action · reschedule ≥48h.
Founding clients may consent, or not, to an anonymized case in a future edition. Decided at kickoff, yours.
No. The Gate Finder covers the full map.
Then the session earned its fee: a contradicted thesis is the cheapest possible stop decision.
Arthur Ketchel: two decades building products and engineering orgs, now running the ProInstincts portfolio. Operator, not coach-theater.
Yes. One shared scorecard is stronger than two parallel ones.
Questions first? [email protected]